Adguard vs pihole reddit. Hi, I had long time thinking of creating a VM with PiHole.

Adguard vs pihole reddit while obviously geared toward ad/malware blocking, theres several features to do client specific settings, custom dns, etc. In my experiences Ads always found a way to me with PiHole where with AdGuard they haven’t been. I might consider AGH again just to keep it edgy. But I feel like adguard has progressed in the direction most fitting for myself. I have an RDP session that I can log into and it hits pihole as well. I used PiHole for 7 ish years and switched to AGH this year, much happier. Wow! Impressed. Running Adguard Home on a Raspberry Pi? Posted by u/Southern-Exchange-28 - 1 vote and no comments I have 2 pihole servers on my network, both using Unbound, and my VPN traffic hits pihole for DNS. Currently running pi hole and planning to stick with it. Hi, I had long time thinking of creating a VM with PiHole But a friend told me he use AdGuard on his OpnSense firewall! I'm using pfSense, and I'm not sure if trying to add AdGuard directly to my firewall is the right way of doing things! Have run pihole on and off for almost three years (off was more due to hardware issues than anything else). PiHole to determine which ad-blocking solution is best for your home network. a mobile way to disable would be nice too. I’m thinking of using docker for PiHole but have no experience with it so was hoping for some +/- on going that route vs another rPi. ‘what can I do I need to do with adguard dns your talking about ? Adguard Home and PiHole do much of the same thing, but AGH has better DOH and encryption support. It is 1 bash command to copy and paste to install pihole, and 6 bash commands to get up and running with adguard. More than 150 million people have already chosen AdGuard. I disagree on it being easier. why does adguard (mobile android app) blocks the twitch ads but pihole dont? thanks Adguard has 2 worse aspects. Some time ago I set it up for a pihole service. 1 and then in the router I've set the DNS servers to my Adguard machines, but that means that Adguard sees all the DNS requests as coming from the router on 192. My dumb ass fell for the free vpn app, now both don’t work . It has worked great, much faster than on the Pi and roughly the same features. Also, wasn't thrilled that they are based in Russia. I reset privacy, cleared my website and browser . I personally had issues getting Pihole to work at all (installed but didn't block), whereas Adguard worked straight on the same hardware. Idk if Adguard released a NextDNS/Control D like premium product yet. I was unable to set it up in the router mode for the simple reason that ATT had given me a built in Fiber router and Wifi6 box. Unbound does not do what pihole does. Not that I send or receive anything related to national security, but still stuff I use that I would rather not have the Russian government tracking. Also Technitium is much faster in my experience, especially when going to sites with a lot of ad blocks. I eventually mothballed my pihole and just use NextDNS. I've set up numerous advertising and tracking blockers - Technitium, AdGuard Home, Pihole, NextDNS with CLI, and ControlD defeated me. . Main one I can think of is that it only displays IPs for hosts. AdGuard is more polished. Tried adguard for almost a month earlier in the year, and found it to be lacking in some areas. While the two applications are extremely similar and overall do the same thing, Pi-hole, an open-source software, is the better choice for most people. hole and adguard. This very same thing happened to me exactly every 6months. I was using PiHole but wanted to run 2 DNS servers so when I update one it rolls over all DNS requests to the other one. Control D IMO is better in just about everyway, except maybe speed where Adguard has shifted focus to for a while now. For instance, homeassistant comes with some limitations in docker vs a VM. Landed on PiHole. my router is a router/modem combo so i can't have it sit between the modem and the router. 7/32 --gateway=192. i would need a second router if i want reliable wifi. I called the macvlan Adguard Desktop might be the better solution, one less extension making your fingerprint slightly less unique. hole, performance is better, I was having lag issues that are gone with pihole Blockada is open source last I checked. This subreddit is a place where high income professionals of all types can ask, answer, discuss, and debate the personal finance and investing questions specific to our unique situations without being criticized, ostracized, or downvoted simply for having a high income and "first world" problems. However, I do have a few questions: What is the difference between using the Adguard Ad-Blocking DNS servers with your primary router vs. Made a Site2Site with my Router so any local client can access it, most mobile devices connect to the PiHole directly Adguard Home seems to be simpler to install and offers much more streamlined execution (off one config file). - PiHole has add-ons such as PiHole Adlist Tool which allows you to automatically rationalise your blocklist, based on historical traffic. Before using NextDNS for my LAN I was primaraly using a pihole. Pihole does work great but is not an all-in-one solution, it cannot act as a DoT or DOH resolver nor forward queries through encrypted protocols without additional help with other tools. Pihole "directly competes" with Adguard Home or Blocky, those would be the direct comparison. Apr 1, 2023 · This article looked at AdGuard Home vs. the problem is it seems if i want my phone to go through pihole, it has to be wifi. 50% of your requests will now bypass pihole making pihole useless. (Pi-hole vs AdguardHome) 03:21 Disk Space Usage (Pi-hole vs AdguardHome) 03:58 RAM Usage (Pi-hole vs AdguardHome) 04:32 Can Work as an Encrypted DNS Resolver? (Pi-hole vs AdguardHome) 05:10 Blocky Intro 05:43 Disk Space Usage (Blocky) 05:53 Additional Dependencies? (Blocky) 05:59 DNS Encryption (Blocky) 06:04 Can Work as an Encrypted DNS Resolver? I use adguard home with unbound. I've played with PiHole before briefly, so understand the basics of getting it set up. 1. This is a con for some as it makes needing to revert to configuring more advanced settings via a config file. Right now I have pihole, it works really good but pivpn and wireguard don't, I don't know what to do, so I think I should change to Adguard with wireguard Locked post. The warnings are from it using also using a VPN to route the traffic to itself to block ads. With pihole you can choose the filters you use so it could be more or less effective at blocking malicious sites depending on the blocklists you use Vs the ones adguard has on their service, I am also not sure if they block malicious sites on adguard DNS. In my own setup, I have Stubby as a DoT resolver for Pihole, but also hosts an Unbound instance on a LAN-accessible port in case I want data from elsewhere to compare results. You don't get granular control of what is and what isn't blocked. Was easy to switch and I prefer the UI of adguard. I just recently switched from Pihole to Adguard Home. I moved to an M1 Mac mini, where AdGuard is the only option for ad blocking. Originally PiHole couldn't install without corrupting my network stack. easier setup, easier to use gui, built in dns over https. I have used a lot of different DNS filtering and Ad Blocking solutions like Pihole, AdguardHome, AdGuard DNS, CloudFlare, OpenDNS, etc. I'm considering getting a Raspberry Pi to run a Pi-Hole or an Adguard Home build on it to set up a DNS, network wide ad-blocking. Fresh Ubuntu on an Odroid C4, first thing installed was PiHole and immediately my networking on the Odroid was dead and needed reimagining. One thing nice about pihole is that it has an “arpwatch” like feature for ipv6. Those are DNS blockers mainly used to block ads. i run pihole in a VM with hardware NICs passed through. Crossposting to r/Adguard, r/OPNsenseFirewall, and r/pihole…. Pfsense doesn’t pull through those well for a home user. AdGuard is a company with over 12 years of experience in ad blocking and privacy protection mostly known for AdGuard ad blocker, AdGuard VPN, and AdGuard DNS. Note that unbound can also serve as a DoT client, so in both choices Unbound is a good friend. I vastly prefer the user experience of adguard vs pihole and it was very straight forward to get up and running. I've heard good things about AdGuard Home recently, so I might give that a go instead and see which one I prefer. 1 for upstream resolver, same block lists. Probably not a popular opinion, but instead of messing around with pihole or Adguard, try something like Nextdns. Currently, I have redundant isc-dhcp-servers handling dhcp for multiple subnets pihole handling internal (. AdGuard Home is easier to set-up than PiHole. piHole would have required outside software and adjustments whereas 2x Technitium can be set up to handle this easily. One thing I really like in pihole is the locally resolved rdns names. If you are happy with the way the complete solution works - no matter which it is - use the one you like. Note: I am talking about the free configs. The upstream for pihole is my pfsense box. Basically -- if you had a choice, you'd choose pihole. AdGuard DNS takes several measures to ensure your privacy safety. As the title says I'm currently wondering whether anyone could enlighten me on the differences between Adguard and Pihole. hello, i have a question. The overlap would be in the ‘cool block lists’. Some updates pops up and after that the whole thing goes down. technitium has a lot of the features but not "almost most" by a long shot. OPNSense because it's a router/firewall product, that happens to include DNS and blocklists, if you don't want additional devices or services on the network. Pi-hole because it's brain-dead simple to set up and manage, with a pretty GUI. With Adguard, you're at Adguard's mercy. Then i have pihole on each network location that will use the two adguard servers as upstream. Also I have tailscale running on pfSense so that I can get into my network fom work or from my phone when I'm out and about. If I run Pi-Hole I will probably run Raspian but if I run Adguard what OS should I run on my Lebre? The PiHole has really good logs and you can both create custom endpoint block groups, and block sinkhole any domain you wanted to. The command I used was: docker network create -d macvlan --subnet=192. Adguard home is way better than pihole even just considering the interface and the ease to update. means i can take down a host and still have dns resolution for the network. Just wondering what the difference is between Adguard vs PiHole (with cloudflared) for DNS over HTTP, it "looks" like Adguard has this built in vs PiHole having to add Cloudflared to a solution stack, is that correct? Great write up! Thank you. If you are invested in Pi’s (which are great), then by all means pi-hole is an ideal solution. Also have block pop ups and content blockers on my safari settings. I mention about the VPN in case you still wanted to connect back home for other reasons. the wifi on the raspberry pi is probably shit compared to my router. Again, I decided on adguard and I disagree. Pihole has more community and support, as it is open source. We support DNSCrypt, DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT) protocols. adguard has been rock solid for me. I really like adguard, same or better features. home) dns requests AdGuard is a company with over 12 years of experience in ad blocking and privacy protection mostly known for AdGuard ad blocker, AdGuard VPN, and AdGuard DNS. Not to mention extensive logging so you know what's going on your Also, AdGuard Home is superior to PiHole IMO, AdGuard Home have DoH/DoT/DoQ/DNSCrypt client/server without the need of third party software. I’ve read several articles about Pi-hole vs AdGuard Home and, for the most part, consensus seems to be that end user results are the same. Adguard was so damn easy to install. I like it more than Adguard DNS because you can actually configure which blocklists and such your specific client will use, including whitelists so you can avoid page damage like running your own pihole. Recursive vs encrypted is simply about removing one of the category of risks. I won’t deny this may have been due to me half-ass configuring PiHole, but overall I do find AdGuard to be more responsive and cut and dry menu wise. I'm using Adguard and by default my devices get their settings from the router by DHCP, which sets the DNS server to 192. You can set the unbound to 5353 port and add it to Adguard home as an upstream dns server. Benefits over PiHole are: - siple DNS-over-HTTPs configuration, so clients can use it, and Android 9+ support changing DNS to DNS-over-HTTPS with any address by system (in Network settings); - support for ad lists from any ad blocker without need to convert them for DNS blocker. PiHole is pretty straight forward. On a side note, I'm using Adguard as an internal DNS server and from u/positive_bias comments, I'm thinking that I could potentially do with figuring out a high availability solution for DNS. there are a lot of ways to build a pihole system though. This will ensure that all clients using DHCP will automatically use AdGuard Home or Pi-hole. can I do that in pihole too? not seeing these options in adguard so I'd like to know before making a change What doesn't require maintenance? PiHole doesn't need much maintenance, just updating the base OS and PiHole from time to time. for example, we buy a lot of stuff from our phone and usually pihole will block slickdeals. Think of this, AdGuard could potentially make a site non working, with the Pihole this is easily fixable (whitelists). BACKGROUND: Doing a home router refresh. I like pihole but I don't like headache, adguard was the solution. it would be nice to see a page similar to what ublock does where it says "this domain is block" with a button that to "allow temporarily". It was OK, albeit a little clunky in some regards. I dont know anything about adguard, but for pihole you either need to Configure DHCP on your router to use pihole for the DNS server, or Disable the DHCP server on your router and configure pihole to be your network's DHCP server. Also have you tried Adguard? I’m using pfblolcker now because, well the urge to tinker and break things. Adguard had too much downtime and I would need to switch back to my carrier DNS and see ads in order to use my phone. 168. Sure I could VPN back home on mobile devices but this is not universal possible across devices. I wasn't able to stop all of the duplicate queries completely switching the block mode to Null IP (Chrome and Chromebooks still append the search domain suffixes) but it did seem to help. so i want to know if pihole has some advantages that i don't know about first before investing Just run it in a docker and see it by yourself. i run 2 identical copies on 2 different proxmox hosts. Hey can you help me out babe ? I have a iPad , and I have AdGuard , and 1blocker . If you use DHCP then configure it to use two or more pihole IP addresses. Pihole HA has a bit of a learning curve, but setting up 2 piholes and gravitysyncing them is easy as pi, though pihole doesn't specifically support HA for pihole, yet. I know you can do groups in pihole, but I have yet to find fire to whitelist a group. Yes, it costs money (around $20/year), but instead of giving LAN only ad blocking, you get it no matter which network you connect to, and you can setup different profiles for different subnets or simply different people, I. As part of the OPNsense setup, I have installed the AdGuard Home plugin. Oct 18, 2024 · No i'm not using them on the same network, i use adguard dns on vps with dns over tcp (no udp) to use them as my primary dns / adblocker. You would have been better off adding adguard's DNS server address to your pihole as a custom upstream. For just plain simple block some adds maybe the UniFi tool is good enough for some people, but on my network I like having the visibility and control of the PiHole. We might also develop a paid version of AdGuard DNS based on the current one, more advanced and with more features. Now what both are missing is remote logging to kibana and prometheus and splunk for both filtering and system data. - PiHole allow you to copy and paste more than one blocklist at a time. Update: I was using pihole for few years. I started with pihole so I’ll always have a special love for it. I personally would go for a adguard into unbound. I dabbled with an AdGuard setup on a rpi but reverted back to the pihole. Pihole is just set and forget. Adguard home has a DNS-over-HTTPS which i find very useful protecting myself from the ISP and i don't trust my ISP providers. Now I'm using adguard home on dietpi. Ad guard has services you can sinkhole instead of just domain lists like built-in unbound or pihole. When I use adguard on android device via VPN (local) one big difference I noticed is that it helps in removing the ads frames/boxes from websites altogether but I can't replicate the same behavior in pihol. and while it is more polished, some advanced things seem to be harder to configure because of being more behind the scene. I have used adguard, pihole but gave up on them because they were only useful on the home network a few years ago. Hello, I currently am sitting on a Lebre Computer and was wondering if Pi-Hole was better than Adguard or vise versa? I want the software that blocks the large majority of ads, that possibly keeps search sucure, and is the fastest. But never say never. More than 70 million people have already chosen AdGuard. For example you can have different policies for different clients, pihole is adding it now in v5, in adguard has been there for months and you can do more things than just having different block lists for different clients like pihole, is full policy. A better comparison for Opnsense would be pfsense with the pfblocker-devel package which offers the same if not better functionality, if you only need dns level blocking and you don't need anything else that either of them offer, use pihole plus it has pretty graphs AdGuard is a company with over 12 years of experience in ad blocking and privacy protection mostly known for AdGuard ad blocker, AdGuard VPN, and AdGuard DNS. Why did i migrate? Well, i wanted to have firstparty support for DoT/DoH which pihole doesn't offer without unbound. Pihole crapped out on me a while back. It has a more modern looking UI. I like the built in Intrusion prevention with opnsense and using Adguard for dns filtering. Completed the switch to AdGuard Home yesterday and i'm pretty happy with it. Jul 12, 2023 · In my specific case, Id be looking at pihole and AGH each running on a dedicated physical rpi 4GB RAM, raspiOS or dietpi, DoH on 1. Moving away from Untangle on Protectli FW4B due to the updated Untangle pricing structure. I tried countless times before discovering AGH. Sensei is a next gen filtering suite on top of opnsense and pihole is a DNS filter. It has data logs, I personally dislike this, and its adblocking has never been that good. Newbie experience - Firewalla Gold vs. Ever since I started using Pi-Hole i've had to work around different specific issues that arise due to my setup. It shouldn't be as harsh as Adguard, but Adguard does have more features to block ads, such as them using a cert to also filter ads (which may be a man in the middle attack if you consider it). With the Adguard app, I could block 100% of these Ads and banners, but now running only the Adguard DNS on Synology, the Banners are showing again. No issues. 7 for pihole. It appears that AdGuard has a feature on the DNS Settings page called "Disallowed Domains" which completely drops any queries for said domains. pi-hole (container) vs adguard (android) I've already read a few other similar threads but I have a specific query. With Pihole, you do whatever you want. Doesn't AdGuard as well? The easiest way to ensure that all devices block ads on a specific network is to set up AdGuard Home or Pi-hole and force the router on the local network to use that as the DNS server. This means software you are free to modify and distribute, such as applications licensed under the GNU General Public License, BSD license, MIT license, Apache license, etc. I use privacy extensions for ipv6 and with pihole you can keep track of all the addresses a device has used over time. a kids network with safe search enforced. I recommend Adguard. ZenArmor is not the same as AdGuard or PiHole. And ControlD support treat you as an idiot if you find their product unintuitive. x and I wanted to create a macvlan address of 192. Unbound can be added to a pihole install to add that resolution method to how it does outside queries. Edit: I’m back on pi. I tried setting all the lists available but I keep getting the banners. 86. inet beryl AX, you can setup VPN back to home and it also has adguard home installed for local adblocking. I realize this is a pihole subreddit, but if you look at purchasing a device like gl. , and software that isn’t designed to restrict you in any way. Pi-Hole doesn't have DoH/DoT/DNSCrypt client/server out-of-box, requires third party software. (although i use adguard home pointing to unbound) *(i recognize pihole has improved a lot over the years but I like AGH) AdGuard is a company with over 12 years of experience in ad blocking and privacy protection mostly known for AdGuard ad blocker, AdGuard VPN, and AdGuard DNS. The log and easy of use of Adguard is just amazing, i did fix sooo many dns problems just with that. also I'd like to rename the devices. Reddit for example loads 2-3x faster with Technitium than PiHole. I have been using AdGuard Home for a while and it does feel like Pi-hole is more customize able however. However if you are looking for a Mac native blocker, AdGuard works just as well. AGH allows full control over everything including blocklists like pihole, can use regex like pihole and one of it's biggest advantages is being able to use adblock style lists instead of domain lists. it seems at first glance to be almost identical to a PiHole setup. For one, updating blocklists and DNS entries doesn’t required a full database recompile like PiHole which, on a low powered device like the RPi these services typically Just installed AdGuard Home to test it out. 0/24 --ip-range=192. " There might be a long way around this but adguard makes it drop dead simple. That's for Adguard, their general adblocker, not AdGuard Home, the pihole like dns adocker. pretty similar to fihole in functionality, but has native server side support for dns over https and dns over TLS and stuff. basically I have smart TVs that I want whitelisted. Really trying to learn here. A community for sharing and promoting free/libre and open-source software (freedomware) on the Android platform. 1 so I can't whitelist or blacklist the devices AdGuard is a company with over 12 years of experience in ad blocking and privacy protection mostly known for AdGuard ad blocker, AdGuard VPN, and AdGuard DNS. 1 < 6 so 1 is easier than 6 so pi hole is easier to run than adguard. Just in case you didn't know there is also Technitium. This way your phiole would use adguard. New comments cannot be posted. My usage scenario is such that the 80% of overlapping functionality between pi-hole and AGH fully cover my needs, so the only potential major difference would be if Jun 23, 2022 · adguard will ask for money for some things. They do acknowledge that the free DNS service is limited. While all are great options and offer similar functionality I personally use Zenarmor coupled with ControlD on my OPNsense setup today. I migrated from a long running pihole instance on a separate server to adguard running on home assistant this week. e. AdGuard Home offers DoH/DoT/DNSCrypt client/server out-of-box, but server still needs to setup your own domain and SSL certificate to be able to use it. The DHCP server on pfsense hands out the pihole IP address A NAT Port Forward rule created on the pfsense box to Redirect any DNS queries to pihole - following this link but substituting the IP Pihole is that plus so much more, and so much easier to configure and manipulate -- especially for the huge amount of false positives in many larger blocklists, that with the ad blocking scripts or diversion, are crazy hard to deal with. i think it was during an upgrade for v4 to v5 and i lost faith in it at that point. This would have also made my docker stack more complex or pushed me Just got an email from the AdGuard people about a new device tool. another potential candidate: adguard home. Used both. When I contacted support they pretended to be amazed that I couldn't set it up network-wide. IMO: Smart by using NextDNS, then try to setup AdGuard Home. Wondering what other more experienced people make of it. My reason for switching was that, after updating pihole, it crashed during update and then spitting out something like centos doesn't support blah blah blah. Guide: Reddit without We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. However, I just today heard of Pihole and feel like there has to be a reason for it having such a large following. PiHole has worked for me for about two and a half years on a Raspi 2b, until I started building a VPN Network with my vServer, which is now running PiHole + Unbound + Wireguard for a year aswell, no issues. 0. But at the end of the day, performance is same on both pi. Yes, and I find both adguard home and pihole equal in dns blocking. Aug 15, 2024 · I searched and searched and apparently this is impossible with PiHole, but it’s trivially easy on Technitium. What's happening is now your router is picking and choosing which DNS to serve. I've been using Adguard for awhile now after downloading it per a suggestion from a YT video. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Synology NAS vs pihole AdGuard is a company with over 12 years of experience in ad blocking and First, I'd like to integrate either PiHole or AdGuard Home. Thus maybe more filters you can apply and customize your experience. Pihole allow me to do more tricks with it but i keep adguard as my main dns so i manage the list only on one things. Sure, there are a lot of advantages to using Pi-hole, the main one being that you absolutely don't have any control over what's getting blocked by AdGuard and what's not. 1 -o parent=eth0 pihole_network My DHCP service uses the range 192. Using NextDNS for my mobile connections I liked the effectivness as well as the UI. In AGH, you have to copy/paste one at a time. My favorite thing is the ability to make custom dns rewrites. Upon setting up AdGuard everything worked right out of the box. When off network you had no value. That is what moved me to pihole. so that is up to what you have space for. ZenArmor is network level so you can block things like XXX or gambling websites and it also does little bit of blocking traffic incoming from outside to your FW if you host any Internet facing servers on your network. I used to use pihole for DNS/dhcp, but it had limitation like no dynamic dns registration, not supporting multiple dhcp scopes, and no automatic synchronization of zones to a backup server. pi-hole comes as a default software without a lot of things even updating the blocklist you need to relay on a cronjob to do it and adguard has way more futures, on adguard github you will find the difference for my the most annoying thing about pi-hole is that you need to do it manual or make a cronjob to update the block list and adguard has Pi-hole is a business now, Adguard Home is open source (yeah, it's rather counterintuitive). Now, to get some of the features they claim need extra commands, like https, that is just one more bash command to copy and paste. Afaik there's nothing to pay for in AdGuard Home and it is also open source. Pihole I am a new user to firewalla, and my experience with it has been mixed. tfjic wef ksfl mjwgqa wsokdj pakmr lzzc xtv saesx swz