Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject sample. If the editor is still .

Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject sample 5. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Some manuscripts failed to anonymize the author information appear- Avoiding Desk Rejection 3 Fig. My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. Charlesworth Author Services; 27 May, 2022; Reasons for Peer Review Rejection – and how to Avoid it. Now the status is I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. ' Does that mean the paper is DESK REJECTED?? Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Is it common practice to accept an applied mathematics manuscript based on only one I like to use this whenever I can, but if the intended behaviour of the catch is to return from the outer scope (scope where foo() was invoked in), then you cannot use this solution. ?) Most of the comments/answers you are going to get are, - this situation sounds like the paper itself needs work (which could be language, organization, presentation to be compelling to the expected reader/reviewer) etc that causes Download Awaiting Ae Recommendation Reject pdf. The Editor will do the first pass on all manuscripts, deciding which papers get desk rejected and which will go through the review process. awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting DE decision. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do If accepted, the paper is sent to production. why holding the desk reject for a month? 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 In contrast, if in this journal the peer-review typically takes several months, then it might be long desk-rejection. After another 2 days, an email was sent to me which said that the manuscript will be handled by an assistant editor and 2 days later, another email was sent to me saying “your manuscript will be handled by a subject editor. they are rejected without being sent to reviewers. Therefore, it is important to reject a manuscript kindly. Commented Jan 21, Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Post Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. The concept is called ‘desk rejection’ or ‘desk reject’. Q: How can I decide whether my suspicion is correct? What handling times Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. 2 Acknowledgement section and grant So, we have made some edits/assumptions. The editor-in-chief handled the manuscript. 3. Share. Two days later, it changed to “EO: XX Status is Under Review. This makes your paper past the desk reject stage and good journals do it to gain ranking space while they soldier on in search of quality After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: 'desk reject', 'revise and resubmit', 'major revisions', 'minor revisions', or 'paper accepted. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. While such a quick There are several journals I review for where you can opt-out of re-reviewing a revision. A 'reject' verdict means that a manuscript is not considered suitable to be published in an academic journal. ’ SELECT REVIEWERS. " Should I expect a Awaiting Reviewer Selection: 💯Elevate Your SAP C_TS4CO_2021 Exam Prep with Authentic Practice Questions. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. Review Settings . I am also a new editor myself, so I have a bit of insight here. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation the consistency of its scientific methodology and the sample used; as well as its relevance and whether it’s bibliography is up to date. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. 1 for an example of what your submission should look like. Also could be that the second status simply reflects a backtrack, but from my experience with of desk reject. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. PCs may want to programmatically desk-reject submissions that are missing PDF files once the submission deadline has passed. ” A week after my submission, the status became “Awaiting Final Decision. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. Sociology Job Market Rumors Awaiting Reviewer Selection. In particular, be sure to explicitly state the review deadline. The Editor will take into It went from Submission received to Selecting/assigning Reviewers, then to Evaluating Recommendation. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be sent for peer review. So, how can an author In this blog post, we'll delve into the concept of desk rejection, explore the top reasons for it, and provide tips on how to avoid common pitfalls. Drop us a decision of publishing, either reject it required number of the editor. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. ' Learn what these editorial decisions comment on how well the authors addressed the concerns of the other previous reviewers as well, or if you agree or disagree with the feedback from the other reviewers (based on the response to reviewers provided by the authors). But if there are some opposite recommendations (“Accept after minor revision (no further review)” or “Accept with no (further) revision”), please I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. The status of the paper changed several times. It is indeed not rare to get desk rejection after several weeks. ” One week I have not been given this exact feedback, but I have received my fair share of desk rejects. I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. Desktop, and Web-based that suit your study preferences, and with the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Among others, desk rejection criteria include lack of fit with the journal's mission and scope, and/or poor quality that is unlikely to pass scrutiny of the review process. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Sample comments and two examples help peer reviewers to formulate their verdict on a Peer reviewers selected by keywords* Desk Reject Checked for compliance with journal guidelines *Tip: make sure the keywords in your SAGE Track account are as full and accurate as possible to ensure only suitable manuscripts are sent to you to review Tip: Increase your chances of being selected to review by providing an institutional email I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. e, perhaps they need to take the time to pay more attention and do a rewrite if necessary. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your Share Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. This status is rather uncommon. That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. This means that the Editor is looking for suitable reviewers for your article. To make an immediate decision, such in the case of a desk reject, change the value of the "reviews required to make decision" box from the The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. You paper has been desk rejected. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Several of our journals also employ a panel of reviewers who have agreed to Desk (or Bench) Reject Policy. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. Keep in mind, editors reject up to 70% of the manuscripts they I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. As you may have read in the article on desk rejection, depending on the journal, between 40%–75% of submitted manuscripts receive desk rejection. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Depending on the journal, 40%–75% of submitted manuscripts receive desk rejection. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts Q: Does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer selection" to "Awaiting ED recommendation" imply desk rejection? Detailed Question - For 2 weeks, the submission I submitted my manuscript 2 weeks ago to a Wiley journal that uses ScholarOne to manage submissions. To make an immediate decision, such as in the case of a desk reject, change the value of the "reviews required to make decision" box from the default value of 3 to 2, 1, or even zero (for instance, in case of minor corrections to be verified by you Guidelines for Reviewers . Same problem with sage. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. it has been this status for 3 weeks, any experiences on what is going on? The editorial system is Scholar One. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. "Reject and Resubmit" status; For example, it may look like this: You will need to make individual templates for Awaiting Decision, Accept, Reject, Revision and Withdrawn. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all aspects of that challenge: specification, design, development and maintenance. Out of all editorial decisions, a 'reject decision' on a manuscript is the harshest. Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. I If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. The status changed from "Submitted to the journal" to "With Editor" after 3 days. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is At times, it may also be a reject-and-resubmit decision. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Improve this answer. This ensures that we receive as wide a mix of views on the manuscript as possible. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been Upon receipt of Reviewer Scores, the AE would normally make a judgment, based on the comments from the reviewers, to either accept or reject, outrightly or conditionally. Follow answered Apr 1, 2015 at 8:59. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ * Reviewer proposing to reject but the Editor has to take decisions to reject or to improve or modify or it is allowed to sent other Reviewers for second round reviewing. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara. Additionally, paper status names can be modified and/or new ones can be added. The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of For many smaller journals, once it gets past the edotor's desk reject stage (into the assigning AE stage), and subsequently assigning reviewers stage, it is largely safe to say that it will get As you already seem to know, the Awaiting Decision status means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and referred this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the final decision. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without How many manuscripts are desk rejected, and how many are sent out for review? ASQ desk rejects around one-half of new submissions each year for lack of suitability or fit for the journal. However, I just noticed that the status of my Are there any horror stories of waiting several months after a reviewer agrees to look at your paper, only to get a rejection letter? First, time between submission and acceptance might look something like this: administrative screen (1 week) editorial screen with potential for desk reject (1 to 4 weeks) potential reviewers are contacted The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. In this example, ‘fluid dynamics’ is an existing system keyword, so you can type it into After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. 8 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist Desk reject crosses? 2 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Reply. ’ Rapid Commun This helps free up the time of editors and reviewers to I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. In some cases they consult with an AE in deciding to desk reject a manuscript. However, on the same day, the Desk (or Bench) Reject Policy. The paper is not impactful enough for the journal. At this It might be that the first status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" was referring to the organizing committee assigning a reviewer for you paper and the later status of "Awaiting reviewer selection" was referring to the waiting before the selection of your paper by the reviewer. Author Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again For example, it may look like this: You will need to make individual templates for Awaiting Decision, Accept, Reject, Revision and Withdrawn. Author I submitted my manuscript via the ScholarOne system. I have submitted a paper to one of the Elsevier journals. Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 2 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Those 25%–60% of manuscripts that make the initial cut are then sent out for peer review. For example, if all reviewers suggest a major revision and the overall tone is negative toward the paper, or there are multiple significant The reviewing process starts when editors send the paper to the first suitable reviewer, and ends when final review is complete. Sorry! nothing found for. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? AE stands for "Associate Editor. While such a quick change suggests that it may be a desk rejection, It could be a reject-and-resubmit When we contacted the assistant editor, things got moving and we got a “major revision” with rather positive, but brief comments from two reviewers. e. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. :-) Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. The Difference Between Desk and Reviewer Rejections Manuscript rejections fall into two main categories—editor rejections (also referred to as desk rejections) and rejections after peer review. Sometimes it takes me a week after being assigned to even do a first read and desk reject or decide to send for review. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. They may be able to give each manuscript only 3–4 minutes of their time before making a decision to either reject or send out for review. But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". Usually, it is not a single reviewer, but several reviewers. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. After 15 days, the status is 'Decision in process. However, we have explained the statuses below: Awaiting Second Opinion: This means that the associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and has made a tentative decision on it. The next day we received a desk reject from the editor-in-chief as the handling editor. We addressed all of the comments very carefully and resubmitted. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. This could be another reason for the swift movement from submission to the ED/EIC decision – as this is a shorter piece. After your templates are created, select the recipients; 'Primary Contact Authors Only' Meet required publication format: This would not be the sole reason for a desk reject, but it can compound other shortfalls identified by the editors of a manuscript. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? We do not aim to desk reject a certain percentage; decisions are made on a case-by- “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? The ideal review request should be friendly and to the point, including links to your journal’s peer review policies and reviewer guidelines so new reviewers can quickly and easily learn about your specific review process and expectations. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. It came back with the request of reformatting it to match the journal's preferred format. I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. CMT has five default paper statuses. ACM permits both desk (or bench) rejects and "assisted” desk rejects. Then I revised and resubmitted. Also, keep in mind rejection rate without review in your journal. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. Here you select the maximum number of Papers per Reviewer. Add a comment | -1 . Sociologist 95d. Unfortunately, some reviewers might reject to review the paper for various reasons. Awaiting reviewers scores simply mean the article is with the reviewers and the journal office is waiting for the A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. To check the status of your submission in o I submitted my paper on March 31. This decision is typically made if the manuscript is deemed unsuitable for the journal, either due to its content or failure to • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, reviewers are selected on an ad hoc basis and may have no connection with either the journal or the Society. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. After you enter into ‘‘Associate Editor Center’’, click on ‘‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’’, you can Reject At least one reviewer recommends “Reject”. ” This probably means that the peer reviewers have declined the invitations, and the editor will now The number of manuscripts submitted to academic journals has increased significantly, and along with that the desk-reject rate also, that is, the rate at which manuscripts are rejected at the very first stage of the review process (Ansell & Samuels, 2021). " @Naseem was rejected. So, good job there! :) As you can see, nothing much is needed from your side for The reviewing process of MICCAI is double-blind, in that authors do not know See Fig. Recovery process and i read it and almost worse than where information at the one where things to do? I submitted a manuscript and the status changed from Awaiting AE assignment to Awaiting Referee Selection and then Awaiting Referee Assignment. Anonymizing author information section below the title 3. In that case, I am forced to use the try-catch block, because a return statement inside the lambda function of the catch will only return from the lambda function and not from the outer scope. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. However, if the status is “Awaiting reader selection,” it would mean something completely different. Here’s an example review request email: Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # I got a desk reject today. For most manuscripts, in the The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor. Provided by two reviewers accepted after you will the all. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. CoEs also have the option to desk reject the manuscript. Remember that it is unpaid service Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Reasons for desk rejection 1. While we typically Journal editors could address this problem through increasing the percentage that they desk-reject (reject before sending out to review). Awaiting Editor Decision. have your advisors looked at it seriously (i. Submitting a topic that is outside the scope of the journal I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Some editorial systems give the I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. So, you have some reason to hope. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. They are Awaiting Decision; Accept; Reject; Desk Reject; Revision, Withdrawn. 1. Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. Make sure to replace <venue_id> with the venue ID of your conference. Over the years Taylor & Francis journal editors have shared the top reasons for desk rejection, which were all quite similar regardless of discipline. A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. There are usually a few reasons why an editor might reject a paper prior to review. I had submitted my manuscript to the journal directly from medrxiv. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. Thank you for your question. 1 Introduction The reviewing process of MICCAI 2021 is double-blind, in that authors do not know the names of the area chair/reviewers of their papers, and area chairs/reviewers Below is an example of correct domain con icts: Scenario: Author 1 and Author 2 are co-authors of the same paper. Post Send Post » 4. After your templates are created, select the recipients; 'Primary Contact Authors Only' or 'All Authors With Registered Account. Review Process . A decision to desk reject should not take more than 2 weeks. It went from Submission received to Selecting/assigning Reviewers, After 7 months the status remain "Awaiting reviewer selection. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Let’s say you want Paper ID 28 to have a minimum of 4 reviewers, and Paper ID 26 to have a minimum of 1. Hot Network Questions Story identification - alcoholic android What effect will the new hotel tax have on hostel dormitory prices in Kyoto? Why is running database integrity checks in parallel beneficial if you are following best practice on Enterprise Edition? Is salt (monocrystal The conference NeurIPS instituted a new reviewing policy this year: “In order to cope with the growing number of submissions, this year we will adopt an “early desk-reject” process involving A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. . 5. TOSEM also reports on I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again For example, set whether Authors see the Reviews and Meta-Reviews or not when a particular status is enabled for their particular paper. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". It was 'With Editor' till the first week of June, that is, for two months. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. My review paper just got desk rejected a second time after waiting for 2 weeks. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. This registration will require only the submission of the title, a complete author list, a complete list of domain conflicts, paper subject areas, and an abstract of the manuscript. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Given the short amount of time this happened, is this most likely going to be a desk rejection? Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. You may want to request an update to expedite the rejection. The online status was “Not Assigned” at the beginning. Or, a reviewer might recommend rejection based primarily on a legitimate shortcoming for which another member of the review team might propose a workable solution. 1 . I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? or accept the manuscript if the reviewer comments are positive or reject the manuscript if it My manuscript was at the 'Waiting for Reviewers' Scores' status before moving to 'Awaiting CE Decision. After that, it changed to Awaiting Referee Selection once again. However, I just noticed that the status of my Popular Articles. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week Criteria for Rejection without Review (Desk Reject) To lessen the burden on reviewers and to avoid having authors revise papers unlikely to be published , we recommend you decline papers with the following issues: • Findings do not contribute to the current practice or literature • Findings that are purely descriptive in content Popular Articles. Improve this Now, we want to adjust the minimum number of Reviewers for 2 papers. The first type occurs at the editorial level by the journal’s editorial board and means that your manuscript was not sent out for peer review. A paper is desk rejected for three reasons: a) it does not fit the focus of The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. Instead, they reject it outright based on an initial assessment. ” I wonder if my manuscript was rejected by the journal editor directly without going through peer review? Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. For example, if all reviewers suggest a major revision and the overall tone is negative toward the paper, or there are multiple significant Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for concern, a further review should be sought. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. @AndreasBlass "If the manuscript is only going to be checked by an editor and not If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. You will NOT be able to submit your full Probably means it will be desk rejected if it did not go out to reviewers. If the editor is still After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. To check the status of your submission in o Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: At least 4 reviewers have been invited, but less than 4 have agreed to review. Enter the number of reviewers in the corresponding rows and click ‘Next. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon The papers with at least one negative answer to the first two questions Footnote 2 are ‘desk rejected’ by the Editor (or the Associate Editors – see below), i. " Should I expect a The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. 1. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". t backed up) Maybe. Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. However, there are other However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" Economist 0cd9. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At least 4 reviewers have been selected, but less than 4 have been invited. At the Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS), roughly 65% of submissions are desk-rejected. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Here, what does 'CE' mean? a desk rejection, or a It will still get an external reviewer but late. It covers tools and methodologies, languages, data structures, and algorithms. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review 2. or interiors, are just some examples of For example, a reviewer might recommend acceptance but also note a shortcoming in the work that the AE and editor believe deeply undermines the contribution of the research. Opposed reviewers by authors As far as I know, the "Awaiting EIC Decision" status is the final time when the chief editor to decide whether to accept or reject the paper, but it seems the editors handled with my manuscript a little slow. Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. It would overload the potential reviewers if they received many papers to review, and either the review time would become even longer than it is today, or the quality of the reviews would need to go down significantly. 2. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Having two statuses for a single manuscript is uncommon. Download Awaiting Ae Recommendation Reject doc. The paper is not within the scope of the journal. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. ' The journal has only had the manuscript for a month. online-publication; Share. This change has occurred Desk-rejection (DR) is an important issue for all, authors and editors alike. Submission Deadlines. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". avoid getting a ‘desk-reject. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. They’ve also referred the manuscript to the Managing Editors (ME) and to the of desk reject. Among others, desk rejection criteria include lack of fit with the journal's mission and scope, and/or poor quality that is unlikely to pass scrutiny of the review process. ' Once all papers have templates selected, the ‘Next’ button will My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. So then why is it so common for some journals to take 1-2 months to simply tell authors Are you sure the status is “Awaiting reader selection” and not “Awaiting reviewer selection”? If it’s the latter, you can rest assured that your paper has cleared the initial editorial screening. When I inquired through email, they replied that it's under review and I would know the outcome soon. If it is low, then it The other editorial strategies we tested do not significantly improve quality, but pairing manuscripts to reviewers unlikely to selfishly reject them and allowing revision of rejected manuscripts The journal Electron Device Letters (EDL), as the name suggests, is for publishing letters, that is, shorter articles – about four pages long (including references), going by the description on the journal site. Does it mean the paper has been sent for peer review or is it still eligible for desk rejection? Please advise. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Decision (EIC) for the final decision. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. user32537 user32537. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. And these things take time. After submitting a manuscript to a journal, some authors are focused on the outcome of the peer review process, forgetting that a ‘desk rejection’ is the first hurdle they have to overcome. The submission process will comprise two phases: You will register your intention-to-submit by 23:59, Pacific Time, 15 th February 2022. For example, did you get a reply? – user68958. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. the journal. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Manuscript Assigned to Peer-Reviewer/s (iv) Required Reviews Completed is same with Reviews Completed, and (v The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". huvl iwnds zejdq meygq ccplem wmcq tpyae shqopj bywjnql vhozn